NewThe Currence MCP is live. Ask Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot and get answers backed by Currence data. Learn more.
Solutions
Data Centers
Which projects get built and how they get power
Speed to Power
The fastest route to power in every market
Geothermal
Projects, leases, PPAs, and economics
Nuclear
Every reactor project, from design to first power
Energy Storage and Flexibility
Storage projects, VPPs, and vendors
Grids and Utilities
Load growth, tariffs, and grid tech
Low-Carbon Fuels
SAF, methanol, and hydrogen projects and costs
Carbon
Capture, storage, and carbon markets
Frontier Tech
Space, robotics, and physical AI readiness
API
Currence data in your own systems
MCP
Currence data in your AI assistant
Reports
Newsletters
CTVC
Subscribe to the iconic newsletter with 75,000 climate tech investors
Powerstack
Essential reading for decision-makers in the power system
Events
About
Our Story
Blog
Customer Stories
Careers
Press
Login
Talk to sales
Blog
Research
November 27, 2025
Paola Saenz
Written by
Paola Saenz
Paola Saenz

Texas goes big on CO2 storage, but EOR rules

Chart of CO2 injection by project type, geological storage versus storage with enhanced oil recovery

‍[Editor's note update, October 2026: EPA still hasn't finalized its proposal to end the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. It pushed the 2025 Subpart RR reporting deadline to October 30, 2026, and in August Treasury and the IRS expanded the 45Q safe harbor (Notice 2026-50) to cover EOR projects and reporting years after 2025.]

CO2 permitting meets EOR reality

This is oversimplifying, but when it comes to CO2 in the US, there are two types of wells that matter: Class II, used for CO2 injection into depleted oil formations for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), and Class VI, used for CO2 injection with the express purpose of long-term CO2 storage.

Class VI wells have traditionally been regulated by the US EPA. But there's a growing trend of individual states taking primacy over permitting, enforcement, and oversight of these wells, in an effort to reduce long permitting timelines and boost CO2 storage activities. Five states have Class VI primacy (North Dakota, Wyoming, Louisiana, West Virginia, and Arizona), and on November 12, Texas became the sixth when the EPA granted the Texas Railroad Commission full authority over Class VI wells.

This is the big one. Given the scale of Texas's subsurface activities and existing infrastructure (anyone else watching Landman?), speeding up permitting for Class VI wells is something that could actually kickstart movement for geologic storage. Or could it?

We analyzed Texas's Class VI primacy and reviewed the latest data on global CO2 injection since 1996. Together they give a clearer picture of where CO2 is actually going in 2025. Here are a few things that stuck out to me.

1. Speeding Class VI permitting is great, but Class II is king. Texas primacy will shorten Class VI review timelines, but Paola shows it's still all about EOR, even outside the US. Globally, 85% of injected CO2 is actually used for EOR, and in the US, it's not even close. Looking at the latest available EPA data for wells of all types and statuses (proposed, under construction, active, etc.), in 2023 there were 49,821 Class II wells. How many Class VI? Just 15. So go up two orders of magnitude, and you're still not there.

This doesn't mean there's not an industry to be had or built for pure storage, and faster permitting would help with that for sure. But today, all the CO2 muscle in Texas is trained for EOR.

Global CO2 injection by project type, 1996-2024 (MtCO2/yr): geological storage vs geological storage with oil recovery

2. 45Q is the driver and the risk. Class VI approvals will move faster with state primacy, but for me the real kicker is downstream in 45Q. EPA has historically been responsible for CO2 storage verification under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), and this verification forms the basis for 45Q claims. But in September, EPA put forth a proposal to eliminate GHGRP, meaning it won't collect the data anymore, and Treasury will have to figure out a new system to get the data. Or said differently, tough luck.

The short end of the stick goes to the operators who will still owe the data to the IRS. They'll still be able to claim credits under 45Q, but this likely sets up a system of self-reporting, where the risk of audit and recapture looms large. So as permitting gets faster and more wells get approved, it actually widens the data gap and could ultimately make it harder for companies to claim and keep credits for the CO2 they inject.

3. CO2 could shift from EOR to storage. Paola points out that a real shift could happen once EOR fields start running out of oil, or once the economics no longer pencil. But operators will keep using CO2 for EOR as long as it makes more money than storing it. And right now, it definitely does. 45Q pays the same credit for EOR and storage, but EOR also produces oil, so the total return is higher. For storage to compete on its own, projects would need $80-130/tCO2 to match or beat the last marginal barrel.

So while Texas primacy will speed up permitting for Class VI wells, the infrastructure in place and the incentive alignment make it seem like this flip to geologic storage could take geologic time. For more on where the CCS pipeline is headed, see our Q1 2026 Carbon Outlook.

If you're interested in learning more about our carbon coverage, request a 20-minute call with our team.

Blog
Research
November 27, 2025
Paola Saenz
Written by
Paola Saenz
Blog
See more
Screenshot of the Currence MCP Skills Guide with workflows to run in Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot
The Currence MCP Skills Guide: Five Workflows to Run in Your AI Assistant
Oct 14, 2026
Product
Currence MCP server connecting energy market data to AI assistants
The Currence MCP: Run Our Data and Research Inside Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot
Oct 14, 2026
Product
Currence Data Centers & Power product graphic for tracking data center projects, power, and policy
New from Currence: Follow the Power and Policy Behind the AI Buildout
Sep 16, 2026
Product
Coverage
Data Centers & PowerCompass
Insights
BlogReportsPowerstackCTVCCustomer Stories
Company
About usCareersTalk to salesTerms of UsePrivacy Policy
Powerstack Newsletter
A weekly briefing on the moves and motives shaping power markets  

Join the community of power and utility leaders, developers, and investors.
Subscribe
© Copyright Currence